<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title> Chronicles of a Wandering Mind - Latest Comments in Bookmarks for February 18th through February 22nd</title><link>http://mberkay.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://mberkay.disqus.com/bookmarks_for_february_18th_through_february_22nd/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 10:59:26 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Bookmarks for February 18th through February 22nd</title><link>http://www.mberkay.com/2009/02/22/bookmarks-for-february-18th-through-february-22nd/#comment-6612378</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Bryan, &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I see what you mean. Though I had not thought the emphasize was on "all" anyway. "Five most common evolution paths" is more accurate as you state. &lt;br&gt;Personally, I mostly work on #2, see #1 and hear about #3 :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">berkay</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 10:59:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bookmarks for February 18th through February 22nd</title><link>http://www.mberkay.com/2009/02/22/bookmarks-for-february-18th-through-february-22nd/#comment-6612123</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The line, "I can group all the different evolution paths into five key types", didn't quite come out right in the interview.  These five types are a subset of all potential BSM paths, but are the most common I have seen as people are building a BSM foundation.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Bryan&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bryan Dean</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 10:48:57 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
